The great Epstein unravelling

[Rideback]

WSJ: 47,635 Epstein files have been withheld DoJ acknowledges with promise that they will be released by week's end

The Justice Department has withheld thousands of documents from the Epstein files, including FBI documents that detailed a woman’s unverified allegations of sexual misconduct against President Trump, according to a review by The Wall Street Journal.

After a Journal analysis identified more than 40,000 files that appeared to be missing from documents posted to the DOJ’s website, a Justice Department spokeswoman said that “47,635 files were offline for further review and should be ready for re-production by the end of the week.”

The withheld files included Federal Bureau of Investigation notes documenting a series of interviews the woman gave to agents in 2019 in which she alleged sexual misconduct by Trump and Jeffrey Epstein when she was a minor in the 1980s, according to copies of the documents reviewed by the Journal. Trump has denied wrongdoing and said the Epstein files “totally exonerated” him.

Those documents are similar to many witness statements with unverified claims that were released by the government in January, raising questions about why they weren’t included with the millions of files made public. The Justice Department was required to release to the public such witness statements, under the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

The woman, who claimed she was abused as a minor by Epstein, was deemed ineligible for the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program, which paid settlements to more than 130 Epstein victims. Her attorneys at the Bloom Firm declined to comment.

The Justice Department included a summary of the woman’s allegations within the Epstein files in January and a so-called Form 302 from the woman’s first interview in which she alleged that Epstein abused her in South Carolina. It didn’t release three other Form 302s, including the interviews in which she discussed Trump.

Newsletter Sign-up

What’s News

Catch up on the headlines, understand the news and make better decisions, free in your inbox daily.


Preview

Subscribe
The Justice Department hasn’t explained why the Form 302s weren’t released. The department said last week that it was conducting a review to see whether any materials were “improperly tagged in its review process” and, if so, that it would release them. Officials have said that they complied with the law and didn’t withhold documents embarrassing to Trump and that many of the files kept offline contain nudity.

“This is the most transparent Department of Justice in history,” the DOJ spokeswoman said. She said the department was working to address victim concerns and redact personally identifiable information and any images of a sexual nature. She said all responsive documents would be published online once proper redactions are made.

Under the law, the department was required to release most government files, including Form 302s. It could withhold files if they are duplicates; fall under attorney-client privilege; could hurt a continuing investigation; or are completely unrelated to the Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell cases. The law prohibits the department from withholding or redacting files because they could be embarrassing to public figures.

Democrats in Congress have said they would investigate.

White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said: “By releasing thousands of pages of documents, cooperating with the House Oversight Committee’s subpoena request, signing the Epstein Files Transparency Act, and calling for more investigations into Epstein’s Democrat friends, President Trump has done more for Epstein’s victims than anyone before him.”

The documents show the woman, whose name is redacted, had four meetings with Federal Bureau of Investigation agents in 2019, after Epstein was arrested and during Trump’s first term in the White House. She initially made allegations that Epstein sexually abused her and told agents she was reluctant to discuss Trump, the FBI’s notes from the interviews show.

In the interviews, the woman told agents that she was aware that because she was claiming abuse from years earlier, “the statutes of limitation of any viable federal violation may have run. She asked agents, ‘what’s the point?’” according to the documents. Agents reassured her that all victims of crime should have an opportunity to tell their stories.

In her meetings with the FBI, the documents show that the woman detailed her allegations from an encounter she claimed Epstein arranged with Trump in New York or New Jersey when she was about 13 to 15 years old, which haven’t been verified. She was “introduced to someone with money, money…. It was Donald Trump,” according to the documents. She also claimed to have had two additional interactions with Trump.

Justice Department officials have cautioned that some files include fake or false materials that were sent to the FBI by the public. “Some of the documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election,” the department said in a Jan. 30 press release.

The woman joined a Jane Doe lawsuit in 2019 against the Epstein estate, claiming Epstein sexually abused her around 1984 when she was about 13. The lawsuit said Epstein flew her to New York and trafficked her to “prominent wealthy men.” The lawsuit didn’t name the men. Her suit was voluntarily dismissed in 2021."

Copyright ©2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
Appeared in the March 4, 2026, print edition as 'DOJ Still Sits on 47,635 Epstein Files'.

Sadie Gurman covers the Justice Department and federal law enforcement for The Wall Street Journal, with an emphasis on the intersection of politics and the law. She writes about the Justice Department's leadership and policy priorities ranging from national security matters, enforcement an

[Rideback]

When even someone as hideous as Epstein can't find anything good to say about Trump

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump ... ein-email/

[Rideback]

Feds asked NM to stand down and hand over their Zorro Ranch investigation paperwork and then ...
https://www.abqjournal.com/news/feds-as ... be/2990694

[Rideback]

DoJ caught hiding allegations
https://www.npr.org/2026/02/24/nx-s1-57 ... on-maxwell

[Rideback]

Andrew arrested in UK. https://apnews.com/article/britain-epst ... ee3f3583dM

The Epstein files are bringing more revelations of connections Epstein had with Israel as well as Russia.
https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20 ... ssian-ties

[just-jim]

.

.

[Rideback]

Pam's been rumored to be on the outs with Trump because she hasn't been successful in prosecuting his enemies' list so more likely than not she grabbed this chance to go public to get back into his good graces.

She was so over the top that she ended up making a mockery of herself as well as Trump.

Then there's this:
let the circular firing squad commence
"Nick Fuentes, the far-right podcaster, demanded she be impeached even before the meltdown. “Pam Bondi needs to be impeached. You lied about the existence of the files. You lied about unindicted collaborators and accomplices,” he said on his Feb. 9 Rumble show, America First.
“There are people that you acknowledge exist who are likely incriminated in the files that you said did not exist. You lied in the furtherance of a cover-up. Pam Bondi has to be impeached. Kash Patel has to be impeached,” he said.
He explored the topic in a show after the congressional tantrum. “Pam Bondi FOLDS In Senate Hearing,” said the title of the show..."

[mister_coffee]

Her testimony was completely insane. Under normal circumstances a person who behaved that way in front of Congress would be found in contempt.

It is strange to me that she bothered to show up at all.

[Rideback]

Pam testifies in front of Congress on the Trump Epstein files that she doesn't care
https://crooksandliars.com/2026/02/ag-p ... sh-dancing

[just-jim]

.

.

[mister_coffee]

Total losses in the DOJ, depending on which parts, are around 20 to 30 percent so far overall.

As an example the FBI has lost at least 5000 personnel. Out of 13000-odd Agents and about 20000 staff.

[Rideback]

With all the resignations and firings the DoJ is pretty much emptied out now. And because Bondi is focusing on Trump's political enemies list she is simply prioritizing. We were told that Bondi had to hire more lawyers to go thru the Epstein files, working tirelessly 24/7. Until they didn't.

[mister_coffee]

...
So you can forget about ever seeing those files. ...

I don't know. You are giving many DOJ employees who probably feel pretty alienated and angry an opportunity to do the Administration they dislike so intensely a mischief.

[Rideback]

Late yesterday, Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice gave a big "f*** You!" in regards to the Epstein Files Transparency Act, basically saying, "You can't make us."
The U.S. Department of Justice told a federal court that it cannot be forced to release Epstein files or submit to an independent monitor in the closed criminal case of Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing the case is final and courts lack authority to compel new disclosures. Prosecutors opposed requests from lawmakers Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie to intervene and enforce the Epstein Files Transparency Act, saying the statute creates no individual right, no enforcement mechanism, and gives Congress no standing to litigate compliance.
So you can forget about ever seeing those files. And just think, if Trump actually wanted them released, he could just say so and they'd be released tomorrow.

[Rideback]

Responding to a construction worker who calls out that he's a pedophile protector Trump gives him the finger and says F**k you.
https://deanblundell.substack.com/p/vid ... bbbdc20592

[Rideback]

An example of the redacting job that the DoJ has done backfiring. Because the DOGE boys cut off the Adobe subscription people have been able to cut and paste pages that are redacted which then deletes the black lines, making the original text viewable. So, in this case the example is obvious that the Epstein transparency act passed by Congress was NOT followed by the DoJ because it is Trump's name they are redacting.

https://scontent-sea5-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/ ... e=69638AC8

[Rideback]

DoJ announces they have another 5.2 million files to go through...400 more lawyers tasked with review & redact...Bondi is eerily quiet...Senate Judiciary sends letter to Susie Wiles asking how she got the access to the Epstein files that she revealed in her 11 Vanity Fair interviews.
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/31/epstein ... j-fbi.html

[mister_coffee]

[mister_coffee]

The photos being dropped by the House today are pretty nauseating.

[Rideback]

3 Fed'l judges have now ruled as of this morning to release the files.
A FOIA request has revealed that the FBI created training videos of how to identify and redact mentions of Trump. Their excuse? That there was no public interest...

https://www.muellershewrote.com/p/new-d ... medium=web

[just-jim]

.
Court orders Florida Grand Jury investigation released.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... -materials

“ A federal judge in Florida ordered the release of grand jury transcripts from the Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell sex-trafficking cases on Friday, citing the recently enacted federal law that overrides traditional secrecy protections.

US district judge Rodney Smith ruled that the Epstein Files Transparency Act, signed into law last month by Donald Trump, overrode federal rules prohibiting the disclosure of grand jury materials.”

[Rideback]

$1 million spent in FBI overtime to cover Trump's arse
https://crooksandliars.com/2025/11/fbi- ... e-scramble

[Rideback]

The charges stemming from the abuse of the girls are not entirely settled, but the bank fraud, money laundering and collusion as well as obstruction are still in play.

Article on SOL on acts of pedophilia: https://factually.co/fact-checks/justic ... use-2d9732

[mister_coffee]

The reality is any prosecutions are unlikely because of statute of limitations issues.

However, people in there can be exposed and then hopefully shunned. Kind of like what happened to Prince Andrew. And seems to be happening to Larry Summers. My understanding is that Steve Bannon and Bill Barr both feature prominently in the Epstein materials.

[Rideback]

Trump has asked her to open an investigation into the Dems we've seen mentioned so far. Her response was that she'd make a decision within 30 (now closer to 25) days. She's been on a massive losing tour of all her court cases and had already publicly announced that she had reviewed files and found no reason to keep the initial investigation open, so she closed it.

There's enough in the public view already as well as in independent hands; Wolff, Epstein estate, France, US Virgin Islands to name a few that can punch the actors in the face via an investigation. Trump isn't out of the woods, he's in the middle of the woods.