Now Greenland

[Rideback]

[PAL]

Thought T wanted to abandon NATO. Paying islanders $100,000 each? MAGA needs to wake up. This is how they are being treated. No money for them.

[mister_coffee]

UK planning to send troops to Greenland:

https://www.the-independent.com/news/uk ... 98311.html

US planning to send troops to Greenland:

https://www.the-sun.com/news/15763777/t ... nd-maduro/

This is a war we will certainly lose. And those eighty thousand servicemembers in NATO countries will all be prisoners of war.

[Rideback]

""6-7" (pronounced "six seven") is a popular internet slang term and meme, especially among Generation Alpha, that is largely nonsensical and has no fixed meaning. The point of the expression is its very absurdity, which makes it an inside joke that helps young people signal group belonging and confuse older generations."

You are nonsensical and have no fixed meaning

[dorankj]

You really look stupid (and old!) when you consistently use a youthful reference incorrectly! You get em boomer.

[Rideback]

6-7

[dorankj]

More pitchfork rallying, you idiots will never stop until all the morons on your side have sacrificed their lives for your so called 'cause'! Such ridiculous, disgusting imbeciles you are.

[Rideback]

King Reasserts British Rule

https://www.borowitzreport.com/p/king-t ... irect=true

[mister_coffee]

I wouldn't be surprised if nearly all senior officers resigned if we committed to military operations against Greenland or Canada.

[PAL]

Great by Jim Wright.
Ah, but other nations tremble when the US wants something. Maybe not so this time? Questions at the end-who does benefit? Not the everyday, US citizen, working their behinds off. On the backs of...
When will the pitchforks come out?
In an interivew, on a Fox channel, T said he was going to bomb Mexico, where the cartels are. Those guys are probalby moving around all the time. You know they have a grapevine and connections in the US. The cartels are indeed bad. But bombing Mexico, trying to pin point where they are?
But the accerlerationists want all that the questions ask to happen. The plan.
And where is Jonathan Ross? Our own gov't may take him out because he is now a liability. Someone else comes to mind with the initials JE.

[Rideback]

Jim Wright:

"“If you take it [Greenland], we take every single base of the Americans from Aviano to Ramstein, from Romania, to all the other military bases will be confiscated, and you will lose it, and the whole position of American power since World War II, if you take Greenland, you have to leave,”
-- Gunther Fehlinger, Austria's NATO committee chair
Any attempt to take Greenland (and there's no guarantee we could actually take and hold it, especially against an alliance of multiple nations) would result in a complete loss of EVERY OTHER EUROPEAN BASE. We have over 80 years of investment in those facilities, trillions upon trillions of dollar. We'd lose access to every runway and port in Europe. Nearly every US OPLAN is built around use of those facilities from logistics to repair to communications to command and control to intelligence to weather prediction to fueling to reaction time to power projection.
Hell, US military planning for defending GREENLAND depends in large part on NATO assets and access to European bases and resources.
We might even, and it's increasingly likely that we would, lose access Canadian facilities, assets, airspace, and waters. You could potentially be looking at a collapse of NORAD.
Loss of those facilities, loss of those allies and alliances, would be a catastrophic disruption of military planning and a monumental reduction of US capability to project global military and political power. The North Sea, the Arctic, the Baltic, the Mediterranean, North Africa, the Black Sea, the Suez Canal, the impact and second order effects can't even be measured at the moment.
That's what Trump is risking for Greenland -- a landmass we ALREADY have military access to. A landmass that American companies can already invest in for resource harvesting -- just as they can enter into business arrangements with any other nation for oil, mining, and etc.
Who benefits?
No, really, that's not rhetorical. WHO does it benefit?
When Trump destroys NATO, who benefits?
When Trump convinces Americans to refuse vaccination and America is increasingly vulnerable to disease, who benefits?
When Trump declares Americans themselves as enemies, as terrorists, as unamerican, and turns violent force on the citizens, who benefits?
When Trump imposes tariffs, destroys trade, crashes the economy, and drives up unemployment, who benefits?
When Trump incites civil war, when Trump attacks US states, when Trump divides us, who really benefits?
Who benefits.
Answer that question and you know who Trump really works for -- whether HE knows or not."